Drones

League Releases White Paper on Drones Providing Guidance for Local Regulatory Framework


On February 14, 2017, the League of California Cities released a document providing revised and more extensive guidance for local governments considering undertaking regulation of unmanned aircraft systems, or drones. 
 
Local governments should be aware that there is another move afoot in Sacramento and in Washington this year to completely pre-empt local government regulation of drones, notwithstanding last year’s legislative victories, guidance from the FAA on a local regulatory role, and the continuing evidence of the need for local as well as federal and state regulation.
 
The League’s Policy Paper makes the case for local regulation of drones, explains why a local layer should be incorporated into an integrated regulatory framework (Federal, State, and Local), and details the limits of federal pre-emption as they have been expressed by the Federal Aviation Administration.  Also included is a road map providing local governments with guidance should they decide to enact local drone regulations.  Finally there is guidance provided by the FAA pertaining to local regulation. 
 
This is part of an effort in multiple states to encourage locals to enact reasonable drone regulations that do not over-reach and are unlikely to be subject to federal challenge.
 
Resources "Drone Industry Launches End of Session Attempt at Pre-Emption," CA Cities Advocate, Aug. 16, 2016.

The National League of Cities issued a report in August 2016 on cities and drones. The League published an article on the report in CA Cities Advocate on Aug. 18.

A dramatic increase in the use of recreational drones in California during 2015 led to multiple instances of drones interfering with fixed-wing firefighting aircraft, as well as police and air ambulance helicopters. In response, the League and the California Police Chiefs Association co-sponsored SB 168 (Gaines) to address dangers posed by unmanned aircraft systems, or drones, operating in flight-restricted airspace during an emergency. Vetoed by Governor Brown due to the fact that it also created new misdemeanor penalties, SB 168 would have provided first-responders with immunity in the event they damaged or destroyed a drone that was interfering with their emergency operations. The issue, however, at the state and federal levels, is far from dead.

The Consumer Technology Association, a trade group, estimated that 400,000 drones would be sold in the United States during the 2015 holiday season. Given the many safety hazards drones pose and the current lack of comprehensive regulations and enforcement provisions to make such regulations meaningful, a number of states — including California — may take the initiative and pursue enforcement or other legislation, notwithstanding potential conflicts with federal law.

Western City, the League’s monthly magazine, in February 2016 published a comprehensive article in outlining the issues drones pose for cities. “Drones: A Growing Hazard in the Absence of Tighter Regulations,” features extensive background on the topic.
 

Federal Aviation Administration Action


The League on Jan. 15 issued a comment letter to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on its newly proposed recreational drone regulations, FAA Interim Final Rule: Registration and Marketing Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft, Document ID FAA-2015-7396-0001. These were released mid-December. The FAA has until June to revise the regulations in response to comments received during the comment period.

The new regulations require owners of any drone or UAS purchased after Dec. 21, 2015, to register before their first outdoor flight. Owners and operators must pay a registration fee of $5.00. In addition, drones will have to display a unique identifier, which is a registration number issued by the FAA. These new regulations, while helpful, may not go far enough to adequately address the hazards and potential misuse of drones.  For example, registration is largely voluntary, and for drones purchased after Dec. 21, 2015, registration is not required at the time of purchase or point of sale. Though registration is now required prior to operating a drone, it is unclear how such a requirement will be enforced without a point-of-sale registration requirement or a requirement for online registration with the FAA before an online drone sale can be completed. This raises doubts about the effectiveness of the FAA’s response, given the widespread abuse of this technology over the past two years.

The League's letter cites multiple incidents of the abuse of drones endangering public safety and commercial aviation in calling for stronger FAA registration protocols. In the wake of the FAA regulations, the League will seek opportunities to support legislation strengthening the existing registration requirement with a mandatory point-of-sale component, as well as other potential reforms improving accountability on the part of drone operators.

 
© League of California Cities